Legal Opinion

MacKroth v. Sladky

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1915No. Civ. No. 1458PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John J. Van Nostrand, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

The plaintiff’s original complaint in this action was unverified. It stated a cause of action against the defendant for moneys had and received in the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars. Pursuant to the defendant’s demand therefor the plaintiff served and filed her bill of particulars which, as the foundation of her cause of action, declared that “on July 20, 1909, . . . defendant made, executed and delivered to the plaintiff the following: ‘July 20, 1909. In the event of my making a sale I will give one-half the commissions received on any of the Mexican properties I obtain through I.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zellerbach v. AllenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. B. & W. Engineering Co. v. BeamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Peiser v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Born v. CastleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Norton v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Lortz v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Jones v. WiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Cowell v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Sweet v. HamilothorisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API