Zellerbach v. Allenberg
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The facts involved in this case, so far as they need be stated, are as follows: —
On December 31, 1875, the plaintiff was indebted to the defendant, William Goldstein, in the sum of $50,000, for borrowed money, and on that day executed to him his promissory note for the sum named, payable one day after date, with interest at the rate of one per cent per month.
On March 20, 1876, plaintiff was indebted to the defendant, Charles Allenberg, in the sum of $9,000, and on that day he executed an agreement in writing by which he promised to pay, on or before January 20, 1877, the said sum of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Grant v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Beaver v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Smith v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Boyce v. FiskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.