Peiser v. Griffin
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and. from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Lemuel Peiser for himself and as guardian ad litem of Edwin A. Peiser, his minor son, sued Thomas H. Griffin and Minnie L. Peiser, his wife. He alleged that on May 1, 1889, two certain lots of land in San Francisco were purchased with his money, and “that the deed of conveyance was had and made in the name of Minnie L. Peiser for the purpose of and in trust for plaintiff and said Minnie L. Peiser, and the child of parties, Edwin Adair Peiser”; that Thomas H. Griffin conspired with Minnie Peiser to defraud plaintiffs of their property, and, exercising undue influence upon her, induced her to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Van Maren v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Tryon v. SuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by24 opinions
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Scholle v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Tannhauser v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Chambers v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Conaway v. ToogoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.