Langford v. Eckert
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, J.
By their amended complaint, and a supplement thereto, based on a series of common counts (three causes of action), plaintiffs sought recovery of installment payments made by them on a promissory note to a banking institution which they allege should have been made by defendant as co-signer. In a court trial they were given judgment for $6,336 plus interest ($683.76) and defendant was ordered to make payments to the bank in question until the loan was paid in full. Defendant appeals from the judgment.
Defendant, a practicing physician, is the former husband of plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Estate of BaglioneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Lowe v. CopelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Finnell v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Weaver v. FickettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jogani v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Hammond v. AllenAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Lindsey v. ClosscoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1986
- Spirtos v. Moreno (In re Spirtos)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1993