Legal Opinion

Langford v. Eckert

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1970No. Civ. 35162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, J.

By their amended complaint, and a supplement thereto, based on a series of common counts (three causes of action), plaintiffs sought recovery of installment payments made by them on a promissory note to a banking institution which they allege should have been made by defendant as co-signer. In a court trial they were given judgment for $6,336 plus interest ($683.76) and defendant was ordered to make payments to the bank in question until the loan was paid in full. Defendant appeals from the judgment.

Defendant, a practicing physician, is the former husband of plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Estate of BaglioneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Lowe v. CopelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Finnell v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Weaver v. FickettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jogani v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. State Ex Rel. Hammond v. AllenAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Lindsey v. ClosscoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1986
  4. Spirtos v. Moreno (In re Spirtos)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API