Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Fickett

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1927No. Docket No. 3120PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The complaint alleges that the “plaintiff advanced to and for the use and benefit of said defendants . . . $4,779.35, which said amount defendants agreed to repay to said plaintiff, . . . but said defendants failed and refused to repay the said sum or any part thereof.” The prayer is for judgment in the amount alleged. The answer consists of denials of the allegations of the complaint. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for $1,743.91 and costs of suit, and the defendants have appealed.

The defendants demanded a bill of particulars and, in response thereto, plaintiff served on them…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brandtjen & Kluge v. FincherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Grand Central Public Market, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
  3. Paramount Citrus Assn. v. JacobsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Kennedy v. ConradMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Langford v. EckertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API