Legal Opinion

City of Industry v. Willey

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1970No. Civ. 35938PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, Acting P. J.

Defendant Refuse Disposal Corp. appeals from a judgment in condemnation whereby it was determined that it had no compensable interest in the property condemned by plaintiff City of Industry. This determination was reached at an interim trial (Code Civ. Proe., § 1246.1) conducted pursuant to pretrial conference order; therein the trial court found that subsequent to the institution of the within eminent domain action, Refuse Disposal had voluntarily and unilaterally terminated its lease of the premises, such leasehold interest (for the operation of a rubbish dump)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Paul v. Allied Dairymen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. TruslowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Concrete Service Co. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. McPheeters v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Hopkins v. Galland Mercantile Laundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Patrick Higgins v. City of VallejoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Carlton Santee Corp. v. Padre Dam Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Zipperer v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Sonoma County Organization of Public/Private Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API