Legal Opinion
Lanning v. City of Monterey
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 1986No. H000546PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AGLIANO, P. J.
Plaintiff, Dwight Lanning, appeals from that part of the judgment of the Monterey County Superior Court which determined that neither the City of Monterey nor Southern Pacific Land Company was liable to plaintiff on the theory of inverse condemnation, the court finding there had been no “taking” of plaintiff’s property. We reverse the judgment.
Facts
On June 17, 1982, the Southern Pacific Land Company sold to the City of Monterey (City) its railroad right of way and track structure extending from Roberts Lake in Seaside to the Southern Pacific station in Monterey. The City…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Concrete Service Co. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Redevelopment Agency of Stockton v. Diamond PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Kong v. CITY OF HAWAIIAN GARDENS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Department of Transp., Div. of Admin. v. JirikSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Jong Seau Chhour v. Community Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Patrick Media Group, Inc. v. Du Page Water CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.