Legal Opinion

Windom National Bank v. Reno

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1927No. 26,068PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The appeal is from an order approving the final account ■ of a receiver appointed in an action to foreclose a mortgage. The facts having a hearing upon the matters presented by the appeal are these:

There was a $15,000 first mortgage upon a 240-acre farm in Jackson county, Minnesota, when in January, 1922, the owner, Albert Reno, gave a second mortgage to plaintiff to secure the payment of $5,564. Thereafter Reno conveyed the farm to D. E. Kulp of Iowa, subject to mortgages of record. There was no covenant to pay taxes or interest on the first mortgage in the second mortgage. The deed to Kulp…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lowell v. DoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. CadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Nielsen v. HealdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Greenfield v. Hill City Land, Loan & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Peterson v. HeringtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Duncan v. Barnard Cope Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Business Women's Holding Co. v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Grady v. First State Security Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Minnesota Building & Loan Ass'n v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API