Business Women's Holding Co. v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank

Holt, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion in the alternative for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

When the evidence Avas in each party moved for a directed verdict. The court directed the jury to return a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $1,500.31 (being for $1,397.31 Avith interest from October 30, 1931, at six per cent per annum). The sole question on the appeal is: Does the eAddence entitle plaintiff to a directed verdict? The evidence is mostly documentary. Plaintiff sued for $1,397.31, the balance of an alleged deposit in defendant’s…