Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Herington
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 29, 1926No. 25,595PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Action to recover on a mortgage assumption clause in a deed from plaintiff to the defendants. There were findings for the plaintiff. The defendants appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
In 1920 plaintiff sold a 100-acre farm to defendants for $22,500. They paid $7,000 cash, gave a second mortgage for $9,500 and assumed and agreed to pay an existing first mortgage of $6,000 with interest. Plaintiff assigned the second mortgage to a bank as collateral security to her indebtedness of about $3,732.21. The bank foreclosed the mortgage by advertisement. Sale was made on April…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Locke v. HomerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Claim of Wilbur v. Estate of WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Comstock v. . DrohanNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- White v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Rice v. SandersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- National Surety Corporation of New York v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Coleman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Holt State Bank v. HamernesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Gustafson v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Windom National Bank v. RenoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.