Legal Opinion

Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. West

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 5, 1929No. 27,507PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Appeal by defendant H. J. West, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, from an order overruling his demurrer to the complaint on the ground that the same fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The trial court certified the question as important and doubtful.

Harold P. Brown was the owner of the West Hotel property in Minneapolis. On May 10, 1927, he and his wife gave a first mortgage trust deed on the property to this plaintiff as trustee to secure a bond issue of $750,000. The bonds were sold and are outstanding. The trust deed contains the usual…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cargill v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Lowell v. DoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. CadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. Wolford v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Cullen v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mid-City Hotel Associates v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (In Re Mid-City Hotel Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
  2. Erickson-Hellekson-Vye Co. v. A. Wells Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. G.G.C. Co. v. First National Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Gardner v. W. M. Prindle & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Canby Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API