Legal Opinion

Greenfield v. Hill City Land, Loan & Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 10, 1919No. 21,040PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action in the district court for Itasca county to sequestrate the property of defendant corporation and for the appointment of a receiver. Upon filing the complaint and affidavits plaintiff was appointed receiver pendente lite.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Itasca county to sequestrate the property of defendant corporation and for the appointment of a receiver. Upon filing the complaint and affidavits plaintiff was appointed receiver pendente lite. Subsequently the receiver petitioned the court to enforce the constitutional liability of the stockholders and that the court appoint a time for hearing pursuant to sections 6445, 6446-, 6. S. 1913. The petition was heard by Stanton, J., who ordered an assessment of two dollars per share. From the order, defendants Edwin L. Buck and B. L. Abrahamson appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

This is an appeal from an order levying an assessment upon the stockholders of the defendant corporation. Plaintiff obtained a judgment against the corporation November 16, 1911. An execution was issued to the sheriff of Aitkin county, wherein its principal place of business was located, and returned unsatisfied. Upon a complaint and supporting affidavits in an action in which the respondent was plaintiff and the corporation and its stockholders were named as defendants, an order was entered June 14, 1912, appointing plaintiff receiver pendente lite “to collect and take possession of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hancock National Bank v. FarnumSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Marin v. AugedahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Straw & Ellsworth Manufacturing Co. v. L. D. Kilbourne Boot & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Minneapolis Engine & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  5. Hanson v. DavisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Badger v. HoidaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. Robins v. SandfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Henderson v. CrosbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Phelps v. Consolidated Vermillion & Extension Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API