Legal Opinion

Lowell v. Doe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 18, 1890PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Washington county, McGluer, J., presiding, appointing a receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtDiceinson, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants from an order appointing a receiver of mortgaged real estate pending this action to foreclose the mortgage. The mortgaged premises consist of two lots in the city of Stillwater, upon which stands a large building erected for the purposes of a hotel, and adapted to that use. For many years the property has been used for that purpose. It is the largest and the principal hotel in the city of Stillwater. In December, 1887, the property was purchased by the defendant Mary F. Doe and her *145husband, Alpbeus E.; and, to secure payment of a part of the purchase price,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Van SteenwykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Hollenbeck v. . DonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Schreiber v. CareyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Pasco v. GambleSupreme Court of Florida · 1876
  5. Hyman v. KellyNevada Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. CadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Mid-City Hotel Associates v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (In Re Mid-City Hotel Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
  3. Moncrieff v. HareSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  4. Nielsen v. HealdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Farm Mortgage Loan Co. v. PettetNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API