Legal Opinion

Morris v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1934No. 25160. Department TwoPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court affirming an order made by the joint board of the department of labor and industries rejecting a claim asserted under the workmen’s compensation act.

Appellant was employed as a service man by Puget Sound Power & Light Company, and, as such, was stationed at Burien, in this state. He and one other man constituted the company’s “station” at that point. Appellant’s duties included outside installation and service work, and also, as incidental thereto, the securing of new contracts and making collections. His regular hours of work were from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hilding v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Denny v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Burchfield v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hobson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Everett v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Leary v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Lunday v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. McGrail v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Rice v. GarlWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Maeda v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API