Hilding v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment granting’ to the respondent compensation under the workmen’s compensation act for the death of her husband.
The facts are unquestioned and undisputed: For six years prior to and on the 28th day of April, 1929, Charles R. Hilding was employed by the Arthur Far-rish Lumber Company at Asotin, Washington, as a lumber grader and mill foreman. On tbe morning of April 27, 1929, Hilding, accompanied by some fellow employees, at the direction of his employer, traveled from Asotin, Washington, to Spokane, Washington, to regrade a quantity of lumber which had been…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of Post v. . Burger GohlkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Gould's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Anderson v. Miller Scrap Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- McGuire v. Phelan-Shirley Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kingery v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Nelson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Johnson v. Tradewell Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- KUSTURA v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Wessel v. Mapco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.