Legal Opinion

Everett v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1932No. 23608. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying to the appellant compensation under the workmen’s compensation act for the death of her husband.

The sole question to be determined is one of law, as the facts are undisputed, being presented to the court upon a written stipulation of the parties. The facts are: For several years prior to April 30, 1931, W. B. Everett was employed as resident manager and general overseer of the water department of the Puget Sound Power '& Light Company, a corporation, engaged in supplying water to persons residing adjaceirt to, and within the corporate limits of, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Claim of Katz v. A. Kadans & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Hama Hama Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Edwards v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. O'Rourke v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Stevens v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Denny v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Morris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Sheldon v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Bice v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Lindquist v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API