Legal Opinion

McGrail v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1937No. 26470. Department TwoPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, C. J.

This is an appeal by the department of labor and industries from a judgment of the superior court directing the allowance of a claim for a widow’s pension in accordance with the provisions of the-workmen’s compensation act.

Respondent begins her brief with a motion to dismiss the appeal or, in the alternative, to strike the statement of facts, upon the ground that no abstract of the record has been served or filed. Rule VI of rules of the supreme court, found in 159 Wash. p. xxxv, provides that, when the statement of facts contains over one hundred pages, an original and two legible copies of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hama Hama Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hilding v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Burchett v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Schirmer v. NethercuttWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Burchfield v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. D'Amico v. ConguistaWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Wilson v. Rowan Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Young v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. McCarty v. King County Medical Service Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Smith v. LeberWashington Supreme Court · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API