Legal Opinion

Hobson v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1934No. 24685. Department OnePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

— W. H. Hobson, Jr., was on duty twenty-four hours daily as a watchman and general repairman for the Greenwood Logging Company, which had suspended operations. Hobson was required to furnish his own food supplies. The company’s logging railroad intersected a county road about four miles from the company’s main camp. At this crossing, the company maintained a building where supplies and mail for the camp were left for transportation to the camp by means of a gasoline-propelled speeder furnished by the company for Hobson’s use. It was the custom of Hobson’s brother, who operated a grocery store…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hill v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lasear, Inc. v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. CurrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Venho v. Ostrander Railway & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Leary v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Morris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API