Legal Opinion
Ancona v. City of Norwalk
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 1, 1991No. 13939; 13940PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The sole issue in these appeals is whether special workers’ compensation benefits under General *51Statutes § 31-308 (d)1 awarded for permanent partial impairment of one’s heart are payable concurrently with dependent death benefits under General Statutes § 31-306 (b) (2).2 We conclude that concurrent payment of such benefits is prohibited. Accordingly, we affirm the decisions of the compensation review division.
The facts in the first case are stipulated as follows. The plaintiff, Roberta Ancona, is the widow of David F. Ancona, a former employee of the department of fire services of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Texaco Refining & Marketing Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- City of New Haven v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Maciejewski v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Green v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Borent v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Levanti v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- McFarland v. Department of Developmental ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Hummel v. Marten Transport, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.