Legal Opinion
Borent v. State
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 25, 1994No. 12042PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant appeals, pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § Sl-SOlb,1 from a decision of the compensation review division of the workers’ compensation commission reversing a decision by the compensation commissioner for the second district denying the plaintiff’s motion to preclude the defendant from raising a defense. On appeal, the defendant claims that the review division improperly found a date of injury different from that found by the commissioner. We affirm the decision of the compensation review division.
*497The following facts are necessary for a proper resolution of this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Board of Education v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Police Department v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. DeFrancescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Bryan v. Sheraton-Hartford HotelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Discuillo v. Stone & WebsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Ferrara v. Hospital of St. RaphaelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.