Legal Opinion
Klitzman, Klitzman & Gallagher v. Krut
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 25, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-2180PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAROKIN, District Judge.
This action is before the court on the return date of an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue, which order, including temporary restraints, was issued by the court on June 5, 1984. At issue is the propriety of the government’s search of plaintiff’s law offices and the seizure of 2000 client files and numerous financial documents, all pursuant to three separate search warrants. Plaintiff seeks the return of the documents seized, as well as damages for violations of its constitutional rights.
FACTS
As part of a pending grand jury…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Klitzman, Klitzman and Gallagher v. Robert J. Krut, Vernon Holmes, W. Hunt Dumont, Michael MilnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Hooper v. SachsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- In re AstorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Farris v. MoeckelDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Central Wyoming Law Associates, P.C. v. DenhardtDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.