Legal Opinion
Hooper v. Sachs
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 16, 1985No. Civ. A. M-82-2870PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.
On September 9, 1983, the plaintiffs, James L. Hooper and Deer Park Medical Group, P.A., were granted leave to file an amended complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and its jurisdictional counterpart, 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), alleging violations of their civil rights stemming from an illegal search and seizure of certain records of the plaintiffs. Named as defendants were Attorney General Sachs, Assistant Attorney General Kelberman, two investigators with the Attorney General’s Office, Tartaglino and Rose, and a private citizen, Dr.…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. WattsUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Chaus Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Pharmaceutical Basics, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.