Legal Opinion

Klitzman, Klitzman and Gallagher v. Robert J. Krut, Vernon Holmes, W. Hunt Dumont, Michael Milner

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 17, 1984No. 84-5443PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Chief Judge.

The government has appealed from the grant of a preliminary injunction commanding the return of documents and records seized at a law office pursuant to a search warrant. The district court held that the search and seizure violated the fourth amendment because the search was over-broad, and granted the injunction. After the government announced its intention to appeal immediately, the district court placed the seized materials under seal. The government then petitioned this court for relief from the injunction and requested a stay of the order and an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. Hohe v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. SI Handling Systems, Inc. v. HeisleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Cypress Media, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API