Legal Opinion
Farris v. Moeckel
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 2, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-621-JJFPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Calbert F. Farris, brought this action against nine named defendants and twenty unnamed “John Does", alleging deprivations of his constitutional and statutory rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff also alleges pendent state law claims for common law conversion and negligence. Currently before the Court are Motions to Dismiss filed by all defendants. 1
I. FACTS.
According to the Complaint, plaintiff was traveling through the western and southwestern United States in his 1974 Dodge van for several months prior to October 1983. On this journey, plaintiff…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reitz v. County of BucksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Reitz v. County Of BucksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Dotson v. ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Carr v. Town of Dewey BeachDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- Dotson v. ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.