People Ex Rel. City of Bellflower v. Bellflower Cty. Water Dist.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
It being contended that defendant water district, upon the inclusion of its entire area within the corporate limits of relator city, became merged by operation of law with that municipality, the existence of defendant was challenged by this quo warranto proceeding. After a trial, mostly on questions of law, judgment was rendered for defendant from which the People appeal.
The complaint alleged, and the answer admitted, that Bell-flower became an incorporated city on September 3, 1957, on which date the entire territory within the limits of defendant district, organized as a public corporation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re Sanitary Bd. of E. Fruitvale Sanitary Dist.California Supreme Court · 1910
- American Can Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Uhl v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. SnipeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Andrus v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Elmore v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Eden v. Van TineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Whitmire v. H. K. Ferguson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.