Legal Opinion
Whitmire v. H. K. Ferguson Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 1968No. Civ. 11515PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRegan, J.
Plaintiff H. L. Whitmire (hereinafter referred to as Whitmire) appeals from two summary judgments, pursuant to section 437c, Code of Civil Procedure, entered against him and in favor of H. K. Ferguson Company (hereinafter referred to as Ferguson).
Oswald Nelsen, an employee of Whitmire, was injured on the premises of Kimberly-Clark Corporation. Whitmire, as subcontractor, had executed a written contract with Ferguson, the general contractor for the Kimberly-Clark Corporation, to do the necessary job roofing. Nelsen sued both Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Ferguson, seeking damages for injuries…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Rigger v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Davidson v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- General Insurance Co. of America v. Commerce Hyatt HouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Pylon, Inc. v. Olympic Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.