In Re Sanitary Bd. of E. Fruitvale Sanitary Dist.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. W. Stetson, Heller, Powers & Ehrman, and Sydney Schlesinger, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This is a proceeding instituted by the sanitary board of the East Fruitvale Sanitary District, pursuant to section 18 of the act for the formation of sanitary districts (Stats. 1891, p. 223), to determine the right of the board to issue bonds and the validity of such bonds.
The East Fruitvale Sanitary District was organized in May, 1909, under the provisions of said act. The territory comprising the district is in the county of Alameda, and no part of it was, at the time the district was organized, within the boundaries of any municipal corporation. Following such organization the sanitary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Schriber v. Town of LangladeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- In Re WernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Woodward v. Fruitvale Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Henshaw v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- In Re HermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.