Legal Opinion
Eden v. Van Tine
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 16, 1978No. Civ. 47185PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
Plaintiffs and Appellants Hariy D. Eden and Nina S. Eden appeal from two judgments of dismissal entered following motions for summary judgment by defendant Maro Corporation, dba Western Laboratories (Maro) and Max Van Tine, individually, and doing business as Van Tine Construction Co. (Van Tine). Each of said motions was granted upon the ground that the Edens’ causes of action against defendants were barred by the statute of limitations contained in sections 337.1, subdivision (a) and 337.15, subdivision (a) of the California Code of Civil Procedure.
Statement of Facts
Plainti…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re Ricky H.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Rosefield Packing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Leaf v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Barnhouse v. City of PinoleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Bell v. HummelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Liptak v. Diane Apartments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- San Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection District v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.