Legal Opinion

One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1918No. 8926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from County Court, Greek County; J. V. Frazier, Judge. Proceedings by the State against one Hudson Super-Six Automobile and Lizzie Goff and others, claimants. Judgment for the State, and claimants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This is an action by the state of Oklahoma to forfeit an automobile upon the ground that, on the 9th day of January, 1917, near the Bluebell sehoolhouse in Creek county, Okla., a deputy sheriff seized the said automobile on the public! highway, and that at the time of the seizure of said automobile, it had in it a large quantity of whisky, beer, and alcohol The inmates of said car were arrested at the time of the seizure, and arrests were made without warrant of any kind, and on the said day of the seizure the 'said deputy sheriff filed in the county court information of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. One Cadillac Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. North v. HookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. One Moon Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. State v. One Packard AutomobileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commercial Credit Co. v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Gmac v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Mozley v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. First Nat. Bank of Roff v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API