One Moon Automobile v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Cotton Counity; J. C. Norman, County Judge. Proceeding by tbe S-tate to forfeit one M-oon -automobile; State Exchange Bank of Oklahoma City, Okla., claimant. Prom a judgment of forfeiture, claimant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMiley, J.
The parties hereto have stipulated that the same questions involved in No. 9008, One Cadillac Automobile et al. v. State, 68 Okla. 116, 172 Pac. 62, are involved herein, and that the same judgment should b-e rendered in this court in this case as in No. 9008.
It is therefore ordered that this -cause be and the same is hereby reversed and remanded, with instructions to restore the automobile to person -entitled to possession thereof for -the reasons stated, in the decision in said cause No. 9008, this -day decided.
All the Justices concur, except BRETT, J., who dissents.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- One Cadillac Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3Cited by1 opinion
- One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918