One Cadillac Automobile v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Cotton County; J. C. Norman, Judge. Proceeding by the State against One Cadillac Automobile; State Exchange Bank of Oklahoma City, claimant. Judgment for the State, confiscating the automobile, claimant’s motion for new trial overruled, and it brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMiley, J.
On January 3, 1917, L. O. Watson, deputy sheriff of Ootton county, arrested without • a’ warrant two persons who were unlawfully conveying' certain intoxicating liquors in Ms presence and seized the liquors and the automobile in which the same were being conveyed. He made return to the county court setting forth a particular description of the liquor and automobile, whereupon a warrant issued commanding and directing him to hold the property so seized in his possession until discharged by due process of law. At the time fixed to hear and determine whether or not the property so seized or any…
2Cited by18 opinions
- State ex rel. Neville v. MullenMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Commercial Credit Co. v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Doc & Bill Furniture Co. v. State Ex Rel. SelbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Mozley v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.