State v. One Packard Automobile
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Craig County; E. M. Probasco, Judge. Proceeding by the State against one Packard automobile; William Reed, claimant. Prom a judgment directing its delivery to claimant, the State brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMilet, J.
On April 27, 1916, L. P. Smart, sheriff of Craig county, Okla., arrested without a warrant J. Sha'w and. Judge Hatfield, who were unlawfully conveying certain intoxicating liquors in his presence, and seized the liquors and the automobile in which the same were being conveyed. Return having been made to the county court of Craig county, one William Reed appeared at tile time fixed for the hearing, claimed to be the owner of the automobile, and asked that same be ordered delivered to him, alleging that the same was not subject to seizure and forfeiture. The contention of the claimant was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- One Cadillac Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3Cited by1 opinion
- One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918