North v. Hooker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action between E. N. North -and W. S. Hooker. There was a judgment for the latter, and the former brings "error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
The only question for review presented by .the "record before us is the action of the trial court in overruling a motion to reinstate the judgment by default rendered against the plaintiff in error herein. This motion was heard upon affidavits and oral evidence, and after overruling the same a motioa for new trial was filed and overruled. As the motion for nbw trial was not'' properly allowable under our practice, any question sought to be presented thereby will be laid out of the case and not considered. Powell et al. v. Nichols et al., 26 Okla. 734, 110 Pac. 762, 29 L. R. A. (N. S.) 886;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Powell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Philip Carey Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Chivers v. Board of Com'rs of Johnston CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Linderman v. NolanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eagle Loan & Inv. Co. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Co. v. FallsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Sharum v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Uncle Sam Oil Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.