Legal Opinion
Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 28, 2015No. 13-55184PublishedCited by 151 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, Jr.; Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents issues of first impression regarding the scope of Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preemption, 9 U.S.C. §2 et seq., and the meaning of the Supreme Court’s decision in AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011). We must decide whether the FAA preempts the California rule announced in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal.4th 348, 173 Cal.Rptr.3d 289, 327 P.3d 129 (2014), which bars the waiver of representative claims…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by151 opinions
- Lorrie Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Williams v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Liliana Canela v. CostcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.