Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Massachusetts

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 3, 1985No. 84-325PublishedCited by 1,615 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

A Massachusetts statute requires that specified minimum mental-health-care benefits be provided a Massachusetts resident who is insured under a general insurance policy, an accident or sickness insurance policy, or an employee healthcare plan that covers hospital and surgical expenses. The first question before us in these cases is whether the state statute, as applied to insurance policies purchased by employee health-care plans regulated by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, is pre-empted by that Act. The second question is whether the state statute, as applied to…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,615 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

1,610 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API