Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LIU, J.
In this case, we again address whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA; 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.) preempts a state law rule that restricts enforcement of terms in arbitration agreements. Here, an employee seeks to bring a class action lawsuit on behalf of himself and similarly situated employees for his employer’s alleged failure to compensate its employees for, among other things, overtime and meal and rest periods. The employee had entered into an arbitration agreement that waived the right to class proceedings. The question *360is whether a state’s refusal to enforce such a waiver…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by449 opinions
- Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Lorrie Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. MorianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
444 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.