Legal Opinion

Lorrie Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 3, 2017No. 15-55143PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff Lorrie Poublon entered into an agreement with defendants C.H. Robinson Co. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (collectively, “C.H. Robinson”) to arbitrate claims arising out of her employment. In the present action, the district court denied C.H. Robinson’s motion to stay, compel arbitration, and dismiss class and representative claims, concluding that the dispute resolution provision was unconscionable. We hold that the dispute resolution provision is not tainted with illegality and any invalid portions can be severed, and therefore reverse.

I

Poublon began…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Abraham Bielski v. Coinbase, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. Charissa Keebaugh v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. Skot Heckman v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Skyline Wesleyan Church v. Ca Dept of Managed Health CareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Ashley Judd v. Harvey WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API