Legal Opinion
Estrada v. Indemnity Insurance of North America
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1958No. Civ. 5628PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, based upon a judgment obtained by this plaintiff in a prior action against a third party.
The defendant had issued its comprehensive multiple liability policy in which the name of the insured is thus stated: “City of Kerman And Its Officials While Acting Within Their Capacity As Such.” The policy contained the usual provisions that written notice of each accident or occurrence should be given to the company, and that if suit was brought the insured should immediately forward to the company every summons or other process received…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. RapseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Michel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Noble v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Schaefer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Walters v. American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Calhoun v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- City of Newark v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Tezeno v. Maryland Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Alta California Regional Center v. Fremont Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.