Legal Opinion

Comunale v. Traders & General Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1953No. Civ. 19101PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in an action to recover for breach of the terms of an insurance policy after trial before the court without a jury.

Facts: In July of 1947, Percy Sloan purchased from defendants through its agent, Frank Sloan (who is not related to the other Sloans involved herein), a policy of automobile insurance. The policy was written in the name of Percy Sloan’s wife, Felie Sloan, as the insured, but the same coverage existed in favor of Percy Sloan as that of his wife.

At the time of the issuance of the policy Percy Sloan owned a 1941 Plymouth. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Pacific Automobile Insurance v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Pendell v. Westland Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Grant v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Kennedy v. American Fidelelity & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Samson v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. National Insurance Underwriters v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Walters v. American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Eichler Homes, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API