Legal Opinion

Noble v. City of Palo Alto

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1928No. Docket No. 6218PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

This is an action brought to determine the ownership of certain personal property, to wit, cash in the sum of $308. Plaintiff and defendant, City of Palo Alto, by appropriate pleading set up their respective claims to the said amount, and after trial before the court judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff.

From this judgment defendant appeals.

The record discloses that at all times involved herein plaintiff was chief of police of the City of Palo Alto, and the money in dispute here is money derived from the sale of certain bicycles admitted to have been found on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. People Ex Rel. Rodgers v. . ColerNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Maryland Trust Co. v. National Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. Goodyear v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Moody v. ShuffletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Berube v. Fashion Centre, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Retail Clerks International Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API