Legal Opinion
Tezeno v. Maryland Casualty Company
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 10, 1964No. 1173PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
166 So.2d 351 (1964)
Joseph TEZENO, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Vincent Thibeaux and Albert Isadore, Defendants and Appellees.
No. 1173.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
July 10, 1964.
Domengeaux & Wright, by Mark Bienvenu, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellant.
Mouton, Champagne & Colomb, by Welton P. Mouton, Lafayette, for defendant-appellees.
Before FRUGÉ, TATE and HOOD, JJ.
HOOD, Judge.
Plaintiff, Joseph Tezeno, instituted this suit against Albert Isadore, Vincent Thibeaux, and Maryland Casualty Company to recover damages for the death of his son, Ambrose Tezeno,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Frank v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Green v. City of BennettsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Parker v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Persilver v. Louisiana Department of TransportationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
- City of New Orleans v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- Kendrick v. City of Lake CharlesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Nichols v. NicholsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Jackson County v. Missouri State Board of MediationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.