Legal Opinion

Concord & Bay Point Land Co. v. City of Concord

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1991No. A049035PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LOW, P. J.

This appeal is from summary judgment deciding title to a parcel of land in Concord in favor of the City of Concord (City) and against the Concord and Bay Point Land Company. (C&BPL). We affirm.

C&BPL was incorporated in California in 1910. In 1911 C&BPL, for a consideration of $10, conveyed interests in three parcels of land to the Oakland and Antioch Railway, which was later absorbed by the Sacramento Northern Railway (the Railway). This litigation concerns only a portion of “Parcel Three.” The deed provides:

“This Indenture, Made this 17th day of February, in the year 1911,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Faus v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Behlow v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Highland Realty Co. v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Walton v. City of Red BluffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. MacHado v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Prieskorn v. MaloofNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API