Legal Opinion
Prieskorn v. Maloof
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 16, 1999No. 19,653PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, J.
{1} Plaintiff Mia Prieskorn (Prieskorn) appeals from a judgment refusing to quiet title to certain property in San Miguel County, New Mexico. She contends on appeal that (1) a reversionary clause in a deed affecting a portion of her property unreasonably restrains alienation of her property, and (2) changes in the circumstances of the subject property and its environs are so profound and substantial that enforcement of the reversionary clause would be inequitable. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
{2} Prieskorn was the owner of two parcels of land situated in San Miguel County,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strata Production Co. v. Mercury Exploration Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Hardman v. Dahlonega-Lumpkin County Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Ohm v. Clear Creek Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- H. J. Griffith Realty Co. v. Hobbs Houses, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Concord & Bay Point Land Co. v. City of ConcordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen v. Timberlake Ranch Landowners Ass'nNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Mannick v. WakelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Mannick v. WakelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Siltstone Resources, L.L.C. v. Ohio Pub. Works Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- Alby v. Banc One FinancialCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.