MacHado v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, J.
In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a deed executed in 1895 by appellants’ ancestor in favor of respondent’s predecessor in interest constitutes a grant of land in fee simple or merely the conveyance of an easement for the operation of a railroad. If the conveyance was of an easement only, we are also asked to determine whether respondent acquired fee simple title by adverse possession. We conclude that the grant was of a fee interest and, alternatively, that if the original conveyance was of an easement, a fee was obtained by adverse possession. We affirm the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Highland Realty Co. v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Walton v. City of Red BluffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Schmidt v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.