Legal Opinion

MacHado v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1991No. B046980PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIGNON, J.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a deed executed in 1895 by appellants’ ancestor in favor of respondent’s predecessor in interest constitutes a grant of land in fee simple or merely the conveyance of an easement for the operation of a railroad. If the conveyance was of an easement only, we are also asked to determine whether respondent acquired fee simple title by adverse possession. We conclude that the grant was of a fee interest and, alternatively, that if the original conveyance was of an easement, a fee was obtained by adverse possession. We affirm the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Highland Realty Co. v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Walton v. City of Red BluffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Schmidt v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API