Legal Opinion
State v. Roman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 4, 2001No. AC 21586PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Ruben Roman, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, *196of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a,1 assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (1),2 criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217c (a) (1)3 and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 53-21 (1).4 On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) deprived him of his constitutional right to present a defense when it failed to instruct the jury…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. SchiappaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. RiveraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. SenquizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. FelicianoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. RomanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. MuchaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.