Legal Opinion
State v. Roman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 18, 2003No. SC 16678PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
A jury found the defendant, Ruben Roman, guilty of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a,1 assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (1),2 criminal possession of a pistol in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to *7201997) § 53a-217c (a) (l)3 and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 53-21.4 The trial court rendered judgment in accordance with the jury verdict,5 from which the defendant appealed to the Appellate Court. On appeal to the Appellate Court, the defendant claimed, inter alia, that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Turner v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. FelicianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. DoransSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. RomanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State of Tennessee v. William Darelle SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. MoodyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. CastilloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. KamelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.