Legal Opinion
State v. Senquiz
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 12, 2002No. AC 19587PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
The defendant, Charlie Senquiz, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of sexual assault in the first degree and two counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-70 (a) (2)1 and 53-*57321 (1) and (2),2 respectively.3 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) rendered the judgment of conviction because it was not sufficiently proven that the alleged acts occurred in Connecticut, (2) admitted a redacted version of a videotaped police interview with the alleged child victim as…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. FamigliettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. CeballosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. Fernando V.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- State v. ColonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. PaduaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. BarrettaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.