Gobin v. Alexis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TROOST, J. *
Appellant Gobin appeals from an order and judgment denying an alternative writ of mandate seeking to vacate a Department of Motor Vehicles suspension of his driver’s license, pursuant to Vehicle Code section 13353.
Appellant’s Contentions
1. Appellant, by giving three breath samples, satisfied the requirements of Vehicle Code section 13353, and section 1221.4, subdivision (a)(1), of title 17 of the California Administrative Code.
2. Appellant was not given a proper admonition when he was requested to take a second set of tests.
Statement of Facts
The facts of this case are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kesler v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Zidell v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- McDonnell v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Cahall v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- McConville v. AlexisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kahn v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. SugarmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Pawlowski v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Young v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Fitzpatrick v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.