Legal Opinion

Young v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1988No. C7-86-2082PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This case involves revocation of the respondent, Brian Walter Young’s, driving privileges under the implied consent law. Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1986). Young’s privileges were revoked for 90 days when the second of two breath tests indicated alcohol concentration of .10. See Minn.Stat. § 169.121 (1986).

Young challenged the revocation. The referee of the district court recommended restoration of driving privileges. The district court accepted the findings of fact but not the conclusions of the referee. By Order dated November 4, 1986, the district court sustained the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Tyler v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Abe v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Gobin v. AlexisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Huber v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Donnelly v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Nelson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. State v. SterlingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  5. State v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API