Legal Opinion
Cahall v. Department of Motor Vehicles
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1971No. Civ. 10289PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KERRIGAN, J.
Following an administrative hearing, the Department of Motor Vehicles suspended the appellant’s driver’s license for a period of six months for refusal to take a chemical test in compliance with the pro visions of the Implied Consent Law (Veh. Code, § 13353). Appellant then sought mandamus relief in the superior court. The petition was denied and a judgment (order) entered accordingly. This appeal followed.
Inasmuch as the appellant stipulated at the time of the administrative hearing that probable cause for arrest existed and that a lawful arrest for driving under the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kesler v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Zidell v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Rust v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Reid v. Valley Restaurants, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Walker v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Agnew v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- McDonnell v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Hammeren v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Skinner v. SillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Strand v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.